On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > > > * It's better to have comparative articles than module centric > > reviews; they're also less susceptible to manipulation. > > I think these are great. The problem is they're a lot of work. I've > written two (POOP and date/time) and I know Perrin wrote one for > templating systems. They require you to look at _lots_ of modules and > also to have a good understanding of all the problems that need to be > solved in the area. > > Not that I'm trying to discourage anyone, just pointing out that it's a > non-trivial task.
I can concurr. I have written a bunch about XML modules (http://xmltwig.com/article/) and even the simplest ones, like the Ways to Rome series, take quite a long time to write. -- Michel Rodriguez Perl & XML http://www.xmltwig.com
