* Bruce J Keeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-02 09:57]: > IO::Epoll exposes the low-level epoll system calls > (epoll_create, epoll_ctl and epoll_wait), but it also has a > higher-level OO API designed to be a drop-in replacement for > IO::Poll.
As a stopgap solution f.ex to test the stability of your offering that's ok. But since it can be written to be a drop-in replacement it'd be preferrable for apps not have to include system specific code; rather, IO::Poll should be able to use the epoll(4) interface where available so all apps automatically benefit. I'm sure Graham will gladly take a patch. :) -- Regards, Aristotle "If you can't laugh at yourself, you don't take life seriously enough."
