On Jul 17, 2004, at 4:49 PM, A. Pagaltzis wrote:

Yes, that proposal made sense, except for the name. :-)  I have
actually been arguing in favour of it, if you look at my mails.

Oh, my bad then. Apologies.

Can we use something other than "virtual package" please? Maybe
"deferred depence"? Actually I don't know that this is a good
name, it's just the best the comes to mind, and anything we can
agree on that differs from "virtual package" would be fine,
really. Let's just avoid further confusion and heartburn.

Agreed. I'm racking my brains (and the brains of those around me), but I'm not coming up with anything. I like finding the right language for things, though, so I'll have to think about it...

Regards,

David

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



Reply via email to