# The following was supposedly scribed by # Randy W. Sims # on Thursday 22 July 2004 07:56 pm:
> A) Abuse > > Authors abusing the system for political statements, to sabatoge > authors of similars modules, etc. > > 1) The usuall solution is a Karma type system. Number of reviews > contributed by a reviewer. Thumbs up/down for individual reviews > by a reviewer ("Helpfulness ratings"). Thresholds on Karma that > automatically invoke a moderator. Okay, so if I go on a bashing-fest and then you come through and thumbs-down all of my reviews, I'll go through and thumbs-down your reviews too and then bash on your modules if I haven't made it there already. Does that trigger a karma threshold of some sort? Seems that it would be hard to detect. How about peer-review of peer-review: If I say that your review was bad, I think the next step is for you to defend your review (unless it has previously gotten a thumbs-up, in which case I must support my thumbs-down with a critique of your review.) There may be a somewhat recursive process of attack and rebuttal here, but the point is that a mean review is likely not going to be defended, and even if it had received a spurious thumbs-up, a critical dismissal of said mean review is likely to be supported rather than dismissed (thus giving weight to the dismissal and counting further towards the thumbs-down.) Recursion to level 3-or-so (pi) of the attack-rebuttal tree may invoke a moderator (or just a chanting, blood-lusting crowd/mob.) Additional weight can be given to reviewers who have posted many reviews and received many thumbs-up, etc. But, the idea behind the tree is that it localizes the debate to the review in question (rather than risk weighting solely on what may have been karma generated by a flaming disagreement about a completely different module's merits.) Absolute dead-beats can still be identified by their failure to provide a rebuttal or continually reaching level pi() with nonsensical or null arguments. --Eric -- "You can't win. You can't break even. You can't quit." --Ginsberg's Restatement of the Three Laws of Thermodynamics