pagaltzis[at]gmx.de (A. Pagaltzis) wrote:
* Orton, Yves <yves.orton[at]de.mci.com> [2004-08-02 11:05]:> Really, IMHO the tree modules and yours and probably others > more should be in some sort of Datastructure:: namespace.
Oh god. Do we really have such a namespace?
No, not to my knowledge. What is particularly despicable about it?
Despicable, no. Confusing, yes.
The Algorithm namespace implies that it is the algorithm that is important, not how the data is stored. Somebody is using a "skip list" because of the algorithm. There are alternative data structures to use with a skip list, such as redundant trees. So the DataStructure namespace is not relevant.
