On Sun, 17 Oct 2004, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Randy W. Sims wrote: > > > Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > > > On Sun, 17 Oct 2004, Christopher Hicks wrote: > > > > > > > > >>On Sun, 17 Oct 2004, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > > >> > > >>>is the namespace appropriate? > > >> > > >>I'd rather see it called something like "File::DetectCorruption" or > > >>something that makes it clear that your module isn't here to corrupt > > >>files. > > > > > > > > > That seems like a little too much typing for my tastes. "File::Corruption", > > > "File::CheckSum" or the like sounds better to me. > > > > File::Check > > File::Verify > > File::Validate > > > > ??? > > File::Health > File::Monitor > > ??? > > File::Paranoid > > :)
This is sort of side note but I really like "File::Integrity". Although, I sort of feel that namespace should be a module that will check the integrity of any file where as my code is somewhat more specialized. Perhaps a long term goal will be to factor "File::Integrity" out of my code but I still need to find a suitable namespace for my more specialized code. -J --
