# The following was supposedly scribed by
# Johan Vromans
# on Friday 17 June 2005 12:55 am:
>> Do you mean to say that 99% of the time (when --foo and --no-foo are
>> both present) that it is because somebody has an alias with a --foo
>> flag written into it?
>
>Independent of percentages, why disallow --foo --no-foo provided
>there's a clear definition of the semantics?
I never suggested that it should be disallowed. Only that it should be
equivalent to '--no-foo --foo'.
--Eric
--
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."
--Albert Einstein
---------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------
