Eric Wilhelm wrote:
# The following was supposedly scribed by
# A. Pagaltzis
# on Friday 17 June 2005 03:05 am:
I therefore further posit that the switch you called
“--no-verbose” is a misnomer.
It should be called “--start-verbose=0”, which indeed should be
parsed in precedence order rather than command line order.
Ok. Then we agree :-) (can you tell?)
Uh. so everybody is emotional about '--no-'. Good. I'll leave that
behaving the way it has.
I wouldn't say emotional, People have simply been trying to press you
for a more convincing explanation as to why the current situation is
broken. I think on the whole, people are not convinced :)
David
