* Luke Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-16 16:25]: >I'm writing a module that, using the magic of source filters, >allows you to write SQL in a database-independent perl-ish >notation.
I wonder why this should be a filter. Based on the example you’ve given, there’s no reason this pseudocode couldn’t just be passed as a string. >I'm toying with names like: > >but these don't quite seem to work - they rather overstress the >fact it uses source code filters which shouldn't be so >important. Yes, because the focus of those name is on the fact that something gets preprocessed, rather than on what it is that is being preprocessed. You want something broadly along the lines of DBIx::PerlishQueryLanguage (though the particular choice is horrible; I just wanted to demonstrate what the focus should be on but couldn’t be bothered to think of a good name). Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
