A. Pagaltzis writes: > Easily possible if you change your interface to something less > magical-looking.
Looks good to me. > > Better name than Package::Unicorn or Acme::RealSoonNow? > > Well, what does the module really do? I agree, but ... > It populates %INC with the proper bits for a given package name. > That’s what I’d put in the name. Package::FakeIncEntry maybe. ... on the basis that somebody is more likely to know what problem he is currently trying to solve than how he wants to solve it, I'm wondering if there's a name which emphasizes 'multiple packages in one file' rather than %INC. Smylers
