I support the GNU over BSD license, though this is not the subject here.
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:53:38 -0600 Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 16, 2007, at 1:01 PM, Ashley Pond V wrote: > * You, are part or, work for an entity that directely produces > work or goods for any of the above. I'm against this, too. This term may blocks large parts of the world from the legal. If the army has asked me a project, should I take it? Of course I'll take it. If a young lad from a poor family come to my suggestion, that her/his family can't pay her/his tuition, should I suggest her/him not to join the army? No. The armed school pays quite well, and has better job security than many other businesses. Besides, the ones that truely creates the wars are the politians, not the armies. Armies are merely people that follow their leaders, and their ultimate leaders are the presidents and congresses. So, will you block all the governmental use of your module? Whether the army is good or bad may not be the subject here. But the modern economics system is complex. This kind of treatment against the army is not fair. -- imacat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>