-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Chris Dolan wrote:
> Don't forget Mail::SpamAssassin. That's a popular example of a
> CPAN-hosted, end-user application. I think it would not be an
> improvement to rename it Application::Mail::SpamAssassin or
> bin::Mail::SpamAssassin.
Does this mean you are advising Crypt::NutsPKI in my situation over
App::NutsPKI?
- --
<< Tout n'y est pas parfait, mais on y honore certainement les
jardiniers >>
Dominique Quatravaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBRk1gmvTYH7KfeIIFAQIoSAP/Sz7/FJaZ5mLTWKmYZvK0kddcDd6lQQej
M8HNHr8Pv3KLypWdR4hpLERRo7xAbbxCMei9CdTvyevfBX/Rdgb/JfTHmjhUAiBV
hZt5YbcV9E70aC+ApFViuZgqZSg7z/gLLKTcUKFxjlXUHENpA4BPFCRJC7ZfComo
53O4ZOp2S08=
=VTzu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
