On 07/05/27 17:31 +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > * Jerome Quelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-27 09:50]: > > so here's my question: how should i name this new module? > > - audio::item => isn't it too vague? > > - audio::mpditem => isn't it too specific? (would it be used by others?) > > - other? > > The modules I see are just structs, and the only code in there is > the formatter method in Audio::MPD::Item::Song. I does not seem > to me that these things are very generically useful; you’d have > to do a lot of work to make them interesting for other purposes.
they are indeed just structs, as i said. > I’d suggest Audio::MPD::Item as the distro name, since you’ve > already organised them as a hierarchy in there. As a bonus you > won’t even need to change any of the Audio::MPD code, just add > the dependency and you’re done. well, i don't like the way to prereq sthg in pococm that i won't really use - that is, the whole non-poe logic of audio::mpd. i'd really like to have a small dist that could be used by the two. it would be way cleaner imho. after having sent this mail, i thought that i could as well add other helper classes used by both audio::mpd and pococ::mpd... ==> maybe Audio::MPDHelper could do the trick? jérôme -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
