Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni wrote: > Hello Aristotle, >> But I like neither the name nor the interface. How about this: >> >> package BigApp::Report; >> use subclass qw(..::Utils Create Publish); >> # loads BigApp::Utils, BigApp::Report::Create, >> BigApp::Report::Publish > > "subclass" would imply more OO semantic than I'd like, as the module > just loads others modules, but I agree it's a better name than > "relative" and I can't find a better one.
I don't think there's anything wrong with 'relative'. > Also agreeing for the API change. I know I was pondering about using > ".." but can't remember why I didn't. '..' is only meaningful in the Unix/Win32 world. VMS, RISC OS and others call it something else. On the other hand, I think it's safe to assume that anyone using those platforms and perl will know what .. means and if they don't I'm sure you'll document it. -- David Cantrell | Minister for Arbitrary Justice Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt
