* Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-06 14:00]: > I always hesitate to suggest Aristotle is mistaken - it's not a common > occurrence
Heh, thanks, but I am wrong plenty. :-) > but I really think 'subclass' is wrong. Yeah, I see the point, and I agree. But I really think `relative` is wrong too. That’s mainly because I’ve written a pragma with relative in its name myself, only that “relative” there meant “with @INC relative to the main program’s path.” In other words, there are at least two different things that a module can be relative to, so a more specific name would be better. Then again, I’d called mine lib::relative. Maybe this one should be pkg::relative? Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
