Hi Guy!

I hope you don't take it the wrong way, but I found your message hard to 
follow. You often broken my paragraphs or even my sentences in half, lost a 
lot of yours and mine's original context, etc. But I'll try to do the best I 
can.

On Thursday 10 April 2008, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-04 at 22:08 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 April 2008, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2008-10-04 at 19:48 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > > > And if anyone has a preference for the location of the data file or
> > > > files (or
> > > > __DATA__) - voice his opinion now.[1]
> > >
> > > This approach only works for new modules.
> >
> > Depends what you mean by "new". If you mean
>
> Not existing CPAN Modules.
>

"Not existing CPAN Modules" is also a bit ambigious. 

> > This should be better be discussed in the rethinking-cpan mailing
> > list not here.
>
> Sorry.  No time for more mailing lists.  You posted here.
>

That's because that's where I wanted to discuss specifying parameters to M::B 
in a format capable-of-machine-processing, instead of in pure Perl code. This 
mailing list is also the appropriate one, because we discuss Module Authoring 
here and I'm not aware of a more specialised mailing list for Module-Build 
(or at least Google could not find it.)

> > I don't see anything of relevance in these links, at least not as text
> > that I
>
> The relevence was in Jonathan's original post ... I guess you were not
> interested.

Can you give an exact link to his original post, or quote it?

>
> > can read and understand. Are you sure you got them right? And please
>
> Yes.
>
> Your mail client seems to have broken the second one.

No, it's perfectly fine on my end here (at least in your original message). 
After I replied while quoting the message it broke the link in two because it 
was too long. I could access it, but didn't understand what it was all about.

>
> > copy-and-paste the relevant parts to your message.
>
> I can't see any point in that.

In that case, lacking good links or a definitive reference text, I'll have to 
ignore your comment earlier.

I hope it's not much of a flamewar so far, but it sure seems to have escalated 
into a minor one. "You are a Nazi!"[1] - oops!

Regards,

        Shlomi Fish

[1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage:        http://www.shlomifish.org/

I'm not an actor - I just play one on T.V.

Reply via email to