On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps. Of course, just testing the pod and pod coverage would be more > definitive and *could* certainly be done without running the code.
Not reliably. No guarantee that coverage for a function is in the same file. I could have lib/Foo/Bar/API.pod where I document everything. I can program Test:Pod::Coverage to look in the right file for documentation so my release tests catch it. But someone else wouldn't know that. (Which isn't to say that the current approach of looking for a "use Test::Pod::Coverage" statement is any better.) David
