On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Jonathan Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > David: > > Interesting idea. I'll add that in as option 6. I don't want to > replace the others though in case the web site disappears at some > point in the future, making the license pretty ambiguous.
More formally, you could say any Open Source Initiative approved license and just link to the main page: http://www.opensource.org/ I suspect that's not going away anytime soon. > I just wonder if a package can really be licensed under 5-6 different > licenses... To be clear -- you are *offering* a choice of licenses to end-users. They (implicitly or otherwise) choose one of those licenses to govern their use of your code. -- David
