----- Original Message ---- > From: Andy Lester <a...@petdance.com> > > Don't know. Just saying why I have never switched: Because I've never > heard a compelling enough reason to make the time investment.
Exactly! Thank you, Andy++ Me? I use M::B for most of my modules. Generally don't need to, but I provide a Makefile.PL for those who don't like MB. However, if I have complicated build needs, EU::MM is very, very hard to work with. I have no idea why people debate this. MB and MI are clearly superior to EU::MM [1], but so what? Don't need 'em? Don't use 'em. I'm sorry. What were people saying again? Cheers, Ovid 1. This is according to the *maintainers* of EU::MM. Lots of people who've never written a Makefile which must run on an unknown operating system with an unknown version of "make" have different opinions, though. -- Buy the book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Tech blog - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/ Twitter - http://twitter.com/OvidPerl Official Perl 6 Wiki - http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6
