On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 09:39:50PM -0700, Bill Ward wrote:
> But if you're doing something
> new that doesn't just extend what's already there, it would be better to use
> a new name.  Term::Terminfo might be good, since "terminfo" is the name of
> the database you're supporting.

Youknow, I think that sound like the best idea. Perhaps I'll rename it.

That would be setting a bit of a precident though, given as I already
have Term::TermKey... I wonder how many more Term::Term* modules that
might lead to... :)

-- 
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans

[email protected]
ICQ# 4135350       |  Registered Linux# 179460
http://www.leonerd.org.uk/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to