* Xiong Changnian <xiong-c...@xuefang.com> [2010-08-22 14:05]:
> On reflection, I'd like to go further and say I like
> 'Module::Ranger' particularly.

Nice name.

> Although the scope of action may go a bit further than a Perl
> module, 'Module::' is consistent with related module
> development tools; while '::Ranger' encompasses the concepts of
> management, impartial service, forestry (tree maintenance),
> and, well, a broad range of action.

Maybe Project:: instead?

> I would *very* much like to get to work on this. Please say if
> there's an obvious reason why this name choice is bad or, if
> you think so, good.

Well, it should be trivial to change its name even after you’ve
started working, as long as it hasn’t gotten onto CPAN. :-)

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

Reply via email to