On 11-01-31 02:54 AM, Sawyer X wrote:
Before I upload the code (which is already written, for all methods MetaCPAN allows, and more) to CPAN and Github, I just wanted to know that taking a top-level namespace here makes sense and get any input on it. Here are some notes: 1. It does not use Mechanize, LWP, or anything for which the WWW:: namespace would make sense.
I was under the impression that the 'WWW::' namespace was simply the umbrella for anything directly related to the web, let it be tools to interface with it, web sites or web services. In that way, it seems to share that niche with 'Net::', which also has a lot of web services.
Personally, I'd probably go with Net::MetaCPAN::API, for the sake of not polluting the top-level namespace and to emphasis the web service nature of the beast. But then, I'm notoriously bad with coming up with names, so this advice with worth its weight in salt. ;-)
Joy, `/anick
