module-build  

Messages by Date

• 2009/01/28 Re: Why we need "maybe_requires" David Golden
• 2009/01/28 Re: Why we need "maybe_requires" Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/28 Re: Why we need "maybe_requires" David Golden
• 2009/01/28 Re: Why we need "maybe_requires" Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/28 Re: MYMETA.yml (was Re: Is there a possibly required?) David Golden
• 2009/01/28 Re: MYMETA.yml (was Re: Is there a possibly required?) Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/28 Why we need "maybe_requires" David Golden
• 2009/01/27 MYMETA.yml (was Re: Is there a possibly required?) David Golden
• 2009/01/27 Re: Is there a possibly required? Michael G Schwern
• 2009/01/27 Re: Is there a possibly required? Michael G Schwern
• 2009/01/27 Re: Is there a possibly required? Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/27 Re: Is there a possibly required? Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/27 Re: Is there a possibly required? David E. Wheeler
• 2009/01/27 Re: Is there a possibly required? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/27 Re: Is there a possibly required? Michael G Schwern
• 2009/01/27 version bumps, Changes entries, 0.31_02 shipped Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/27 Re: automating the M::B release cycle? David Golden
• 2009/01/26 Re: automating the M::B release cycle? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/26 Re: automating the M::B release cycle? Ron Savage
• 2009/01/26 Re: automating the M::B release cycle? David Golden
• 2009/01/26 Re: automating the M::B release cycle? David Golden
• 2009/01/26 Re: automating the M::B release cycle? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/26 Re: automating the M::B release cycle? Ron Savage
• 2009/01/26 Re: automating the M::B release cycle? David Golden
• 2009/01/26 Re: Is there a possibly required? Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/26 Re: automating the M::B release cycle? David Golden
• 2009/01/26 Re: automating the M::B release cycle? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/26 Re: automating the M::B release cycle? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/26 automating the M::B release cycle? David Golden
• 2009/01/26 Re: Is there a possibly required? Nicholas Clark
• 2009/01/26 Re: Is there a possibly required? Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/26 Re: Is there a possibly required? Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/25 Re: Is there a possibly required? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/25 Re: Is there a possibly required? Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
• 2009/01/25 Re: Is there a possibly required? Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/25 Re: Is there a possibly required? Michael G Schwern
• 2009/01/24 Re: Is there a possibly required? Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
• 2009/01/24 Re: Is there a possibly required? Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/24 Re: Is there a possibly required? Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
• 2009/01/24 Is there a possibly required? Lyle
• 2009/01/23 Re: Adding directories to the install sets Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/23 Re: Adding directories to the install sets Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/23 Re: Adding directories to the install sets Ken Williams
• 2009/01/23 Re: Adding directories to the install sets Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/23 Re: Adding directories to the install sets Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/23 Re: Adding directories to the install sets Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/21 A little clarity on adding new elements to the install Randy J. Ray
• 2009/01/18 Re: Adding directories to the install sets Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/18 Re: Adding directories to the install sets Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/18 Re: Adding directories to the install sets Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/17 Re: tmpdir within tmpdir? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/17 Adding directories to the install sets Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/17 File::Temp seems to solve Win32 directory deletion heisenbug David Golden
• 2009/01/16 Re: temp directories Nicholas Clark
• 2009/01/16 Re: temp directories David Golden
• 2009/01/16 Re: win32 unlink() Curtis Jewell
• 2009/01/16 Re: win32 unlink() Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/16 RE: temp directories Jan Dubois
• 2009/01/15 Re: temp directories Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/15 Re: win32 unlink() David Golden
• 2009/01/15 Re: win32 unlink() Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/15 RE: win32 unlink() Jan Dubois
• 2009/01/15 Re: Proposed patch: try harder to delete files on Win32 before giving up and dying Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/15 Re: win32 unlink() David Golden
• 2009/01/15 RE: win32 unlink() Jan Dubois
• 2009/01/15 Re: win32 unlink() Ken Williams
• 2009/01/15 Re: Proposed patch: try harder to delete files on Win32 before giving up and dying Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/15 Re: Proposed patch: try harder to delete files on Win32 before giving up and dying demerphq
• 2009/01/15 Re: Proposed patch: try harder to delete files on Win32 before giving up and dying Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/15 Proposed patch: try harder to delete files on Win32 before giving up and dying David Golden
• 2009/01/15 Re: compat.t failure on Win32 for 0.31012 Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/14 Re: Win32 broke and nobody noticed... again... Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/14 Re: win32 unlink() David Golden
• 2009/01/14 Re: win32 unlink() Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/14 Re: compat.t failure on Win32 for 0.31012 Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/14 RE: compat.t failure on Win32 for 0.31012 Jan Dubois
• 2009/01/14 Re: compat.t failure on Win32 for 0.31012 David Golden
• 2009/01/14 Re: Win32 testing (and testing in general) Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/14 Re: compat.t failure on Win32 for 0.31012 Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/14 Re: Win32 testing (and testing in general) David Golden
• 2009/01/14 Re: compat.t failure on Win32 for 0.31012 David Golden
• 2009/01/14 RE: Smoke testing on Win32 (was Re: Win32 broke and nobody noticed... again...) Jan Dubois
• 2009/01/14 RE: compat.t failure on Win32 for 0.31012 Jan Dubois
• 2009/01/14 Re: Win32 testing (and testing in general) Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/14 Re: Win32 testing (and testing in general) David Golden
• 2009/01/14 Re: Win32 testing (and testing in general) Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/14 RE: Win32 broke and nobody noticed... again... Curtis Jewell
• 2009/01/14 Re: Win32 broke and nobody noticed... again... Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/14 compat.t failure on Win32 for 0.31012 David Golden
• 2009/01/14 Re: Win32 broke and nobody noticed... again... David Golden
• 2009/01/14 Smoke testing on Win32 (was Re: Win32 broke and nobody noticed... again...) David Golden
• 2009/01/13 Re: Win32 broke and nobody noticed... again... Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/13 Re: Win32 broke and nobody noticed... again... Curtis Jewell
• 2009/01/13 Re: Win32 broke and nobody noticed... again... David Golden
• 2009/01/13 RE: Win32 broke and nobody noticed... again... Steve Hay
• 2009/01/13 Re: Win32 broke and nobody noticed... again... Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/13 [rt.cpan.org #41166] svn.perl.org r11816 broke zim: install_sets modification not preserved anymore Eric Wilhelm via RT
• 2009/01/13 Re: Win32 broke and nobody noticed... again... Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/12 Re: Win32 broke and nobody noticed... again... David Golden
• 2009/01/12 Re: Win32 broke and nobody noticed... again... Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/12 Re: Win32 broke and nobody noticed... again... Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/12 Re: Can we have a 0.3101 release? Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/12 Re: Can we have a 0.3101 release? John Peacock
• 2009/01/12 Re: Win32 broke and nobody noticed... again... Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/12 Re: Failed: PAUSE indexer report EWILHELM/Module-Build-0.3101.tar.gz David Golden
• 2009/01/12 Re: Can we have a 0.3101 release? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/12 Re: Failed: PAUSE indexer report EWILHELM/Module-Build-0.3101.tar.gz Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/12 Re: Can we have a 0.3101 release? Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/12 new META-spec/tags in repository Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/12 Fwd: Failed: PAUSE indexer report EWILHELM/Module-Build-0.3101.tar.gz Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/12 Re: r12327..12408. - Module-Build/tags/... Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/12 Re: Can we have a 0.3101 release? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/12 Re: Can we have a 0.3101 release? John Peacock
• 2009/01/12 Re: Can we have a 0.3101 release? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/09 Re: [svn:Module-Build] r12309 - misfire? David Golden
• 2009/01/09 Re: [svn:Module-Build] r12309 - misfire? Curtis Jewell
• 2009/01/09 Re: [svn:Module-Build] r12309 - misfire? David Golden
• 2009/01/09 Re: [svn:Module-Build] r12309 - misfire? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/08 Can we have a 0.3101 release? David Golden
• 2009/01/08 ConfigData.pm in blead? David Golden
• 2009/01/08 Re: [PATCH] Update Module::Build to 0.31 from CPAN David Golden
• 2009/01/08 Re: [PATCH] Update Module::Build to 0.31 from CPAN Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/08 Re: Q: including pre-compiled SWIG .so with M::B? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/01/08 Re: [PATCH] Update Module::Build to 0.31 from CPAN David Golden
• 2009/01/08 Re: [PATCH] Update Module::Build to 0.31 from CPAN Ken Williams
• 2009/01/08 Re: [PATCH] Update Module::Build to 0.31 from CPAN Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• 2009/01/08 Re: [PATCH] Update Module::Build to 0.31 from CPAN David Golden
• 2009/01/08 Re: [PATCH] Update Module::Build to 0.31 from CPAN Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• 2009/01/08 Re: Q: including pre-compiled SWIG .so with M::B? Dominique Dumont
• 2009/01/08 Re: Ready for 0.3101 release to merge into blead? Nicholas Clark
• 2009/01/08 Re: [PATCH] Update Module::Build to 0.31 from CPAN Steffen Mueller
• 2009/01/07 Re: Ready for 0.3101 release to merge into blead? Adam Kennedy
• 2009/01/07 Re: [PATCH] Update Module::Build to 0.31 from CPAN demerphq
• 2009/01/07 Re: [PATCH] Update Module::Build to 0.31 from CPAN Nicholas Clark
• 2009/01/07 Ready for 0.3101 release to merge into blead? David Golden
• 2009/01/07 Re: [PATCH] Update Module::Build to 0.31 from CPAN David Golden
• 2009/01/06 Q: including pre-compiled SWIG .so with M::B? Matt Lawson
• 2009/01/03 Re: MANIFEST.SKIP Johan Vromans
• 2009/01/02 Re: MANIFEST.SKIP Ken Williams
• 2009/01/02 MANIFEST.SKIP Johan Vromans
• 2008/12/20 Re: tag names Ken Williams
• 2008/12/20 Re: tag names Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/19 Re: Module::Build 0.30_02 - please test Ken Williams
• 2008/12/16 Re: get_options not a class method Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/16 Re: Module::Build 0.30_02 - please test Ken Williams
• 2008/12/16 Re: 0.30_01 some tests fail if Software::License isn't installed Ken Williams
• 2008/12/16 Re: Module::Build 0.30_02 - please test Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/16 Re: Module::Build 0.30_02 - please test David Golden
• 2008/12/15 Re: Module::Build 0.30_02 - please test Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/15 Re: 0.30_02 shipped (fixed: Software::License isn't installed) Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/15 Re: 0.30_01 some tests fail if Software::License isn't installed Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/15 Re: 0.30_01 some tests fail if Software::License isn't installed Ken Williams
• 2008/12/15 Re: 0.30_01 some tests fail if Software::License isn't installed Ken Williams
• 2008/12/14 Re: 0.30_01 some tests fail if Software::License isn't installed Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/14 0.30_01 some tests fail if Software::License isn't installed David Golden
• 2008/12/13 Re: [help wanted] META-spec.pod versioning Ken Williams
• 2008/12/12 Re: the release shortlist Dave Rolsky
• 2008/12/12 Re: compat Makefile.PL bombs when Build.PL does exit(0) David Golden
• 2008/12/12 Re: compat Makefile.PL bombs when Build.PL does exit(0) Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/12 Re: [help wanted] META-spec.pod versioning Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/12 Re: the release shortlist Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/12 Re: M::B will now validate --installdirs David E. Wheeler
• 2008/12/12 Re: [help wanted] META-spec.pod versioning Ken Williams
• 2008/12/12 Re: compat Makefile.PL bombs when Build.PL does exit(0) Ken Williams
• 2008/12/12 Re: the release shortlist Ken Williams
• 2008/12/12 Re: M::B will now validate --installdirs Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/12 Re: the release shortlist Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/12 Re: Module::Build 0.30_01 - please test David Golden
• 2008/12/12 Re: long overdue for a release David E. Wheeler
• 2008/12/12 Re: M::B will now validate --installdirs David E. Wheeler
• 2008/12/11 Re: Module::Build 0.30_01 - authors need Software::License Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/11 Re: Module::Build 0.30_01 - please test Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/11 Re: Module::Build 0.30_01 - please test David Golden
• 2008/12/11 Re: Module::Build 0.30_01 - please test David Golden
• 2008/12/11 Re: compat Makefile.PL bombs when Build.PL does exit(0) David Golden
• 2008/12/11 Re: long overdue for a release Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/11 Module::Build 0.30_01 - please test Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/11 M::B will now validate --installdirs Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/11 Re: [help wanted] META-spec.pod versioning Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/11 compat Makefile.PL bombs when Build.PL does exit(0) Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/11 META-spec.pod versioning Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/11 Re: PATCH: Fix Archive::Tar permissions Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/11 Re: [rt.cpan.org #41166] install_sets modification not preserved anymore Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/12/09 Re: empty directories Marvin Humphrey
• 2008/12/09 Re: empty directories Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/11/22 Re: PATCH: Fix Archive::Tar permissions David Golden
• 2008/11/21 Re: PATCH: Fix Archive::Tar permissions Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/11/21 PATCH: Fix Archive::Tar permissions David Golden
• 2008/11/21 Re: Archive::Tar permissions Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/11/21 Re: sudo detildefy bug Ken Williams
• 2008/11/21 Re: Archive::Tar permissions Ken Williams
• 2008/11/21 Re: sudo detildefy bug Ken Williams
• 2008/11/20 Re: long overdue for a release Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/11/20 Re: abs_path bugs in RT Ken Williams
• 2008/11/20 Re: long overdue for a release David E. Wheeler
• 2008/11/20 Re: Archive::Tar permissions Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/11/20 Re: long overdue for a release David Golden
• 2008/11/20 long overdue for a release Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/11/20 Re: r12024 - license and Software::License stuff Eric Wilhelm
• 2008/11/20 sudo detildefy bug Eric Wilhelm

• Earlier messages
• Later messages