On Jul 22, 2006, at 7:59 AM, John Peacock wrote:
Ron Savage wrote:
I don't know all the inner details, but this M::B and version
dancing gives me the strong impression that something is terribly
wrong here at a fundamental design level.
Clearly something's wrong, but it may not be anything big, even
though it's a
sort of show-stopper.
The problem is one of communication and insufficient testing, not
architectural.
I didn't think to test on a machine that didn't have *either* M::B or
version.pm installed (which is the only case where there is any
problem).
Additionally, I was busy with real life and I didn't notice that
Ken released a
non-alpha release on a Friday (not placing blame, just noting the
facts).
I'll take the blame, but I won't feel very bad about it. =) I'm
trying to be much more aggressive about releasing often than we did
between 0.26xx and 0.28. That sucked. I don't mind releasing some
stuff with bugs & dependency issues, or whatever, if the project
keeps moving forward and the problems get fixed.
-Ken
