David Wheeler wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2006, at 08:00, Julian Mehnle wrote:
> > I, too, think the former, because it's how version numbers on CPAN
> > should
> > look.
>
> But as users start to use version.pm for their modules, and as they
> start to use Perl 5.10, that's not how they'll look. They'll look
> like the latter, v0.61.129. Whether or not that should be the case is
> another matter.

By the principle of least surprise, the CPAN indexer should probably accept 
both, but convert the v form to the non-v form.  I have no idea how to 
influence the CPAN indexer (and the other cpan.org parts), though.

Attachment: pgpnyxAcekHNn.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to