On Feb 16, 2008 11:51 PM, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks like we need to roll this back to be compatible with 5.6.2. Are > we trying to be compatible with 5.6.2?
Yeah, I guess we are. Thanks for the spot. -Ken
On Feb 16, 2008 11:51 PM, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks like we need to roll this back to be compatible with 5.6.2. Are > we trying to be compatible with 5.6.2?
Yeah, I guess we are. Thanks for the spot. -Ken