Eric Wilhelm wrote:
# from Shlomi Fish
# on Friday 29 February 2008 05:55:

No. dist_version_from points to:

dist_version_from => "lib/Test/Run/Core.pm",

Oh. So module_name is set, but doesn't correspond to dist_version_from. That's a different case, and apparently also one for which there was no coverage.

I suppose the fix would be to rollback r10222 and write some tests which represent the various behaviors to which we're locked-in.

Yes, module_name should have no effect on dist_version except to be a default for dist_version_from.


--
Being faith-based doesn't trump reality.
        -- Bruce Sterling

Reply via email to