David Golden said:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Gabor Szabo <szab...@gmail.com> wrote:
I am now trying to get Bugzilla packaged to CPAN and it is
explicitely licensed under mozilla1.1
Would it be possible to add those two keys to the valid list of values
of the license field?
Software::License http://search.cpan.org/dist/Software-License/
already has them separated.
Hi, Gabor. Just list it as "mozilla" or "open_source" for now.
The way licenses get handled will be revised when we release the
CPAN Meta 2.0 spec later this year. (And both Mozilla licenses are
already included separately in the valid list in the draft 2.0
spec).
Nice. How about AGPL_v3?
Is the draft spec available for review somewhere? :)
- Salve, who would like to see a few more licenses added to M:B anyway
--
#!/usr/bin/perl
sub AUTOLOAD{$AUTOLOAD=~/.*::(\d+)/;seek(DATA,$1,0);print# Salve Joshua Nilsen
getc DATA}$"="'};&{'";@_=unpack("C*",unpack("u*",':4@,$'.# <s...@foo.no>
'2!--"5-(50P%$PL,!0X354UC-PP%/0\`'."\n"));eval "&{'@_'}"; __END__ is near! :)
