On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Adam Kennedy <a...@ali.as> wrote: > I was thinking about dropping anything without a specific numberic > version completely and requiring manual, because I figure the chances > for misidentification is too high (whereas a number will only really > be there after a human has put some specific thought into it).
You're sort of talking about the equivalent of "use strict" for module importing. (Though note that it can't be done via C<use parent 'Foo'>.) I think that's a sensible strategy, though I think you'll annoy people who really want it to DWIM rather than have to be explicit about it. -- David
