Thanks Jeremy. That's exactly what I needed to know.
Dave On 9/25/07, Jeremy Sowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Wortham wrote: > > I am a module developer with a little experience. I'm not looking for > > everyday sysadmin info. > > > > When my module went public, I noticed that there were some notable > > differences between 2.0 and 2.2... which makes me wonder if it is > > possible to install of 2.0.x and 2.2.x on the same OS. I'm only > > hoping they can be installed at the same time... they don't need to > > run simultaneously. > > > > I'm wondering if the APR libs are stored in the --prefix directory or > > somewhere else. Clearly they won't be happy neighbors if one install > > clobbers the libraries of the other. > > > > Does anyone have any experience with this? I'm hoping to be able to > > dev-test my module in 2.0 and 2.2 without having to run another > > machine. > > If you are building and installing from source, you can just choose > different prefixes and have the two sitting side by side. Each instal- > lation will build and link against its own version of the APR unless you > explicitly tell it otherwise using the configure script. > > J. > -- > +0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ > www: http://www.azazel.net/ > pgp: http://www.azazel.net/~azazel/js_key.asc > +0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFG+Nm6KpCP1/xeVbsRAsHZAJ46RZ45AM/JsW55Q6hG28zJYiFyeQCg1U3U > TRfRx5565V7YgVv9D70x83Q= > =3Fny > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
