Nick Kew wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:57:09 -0700 > "Stuart Roll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It smells like some bad state carries over from one connection to >> another but I don't know how that could happen. >> > > I can believe something like that might be happening, though I'm > reluctant to get involved unless we can devise a reproducible testcase. >
If you can reproduce that with the prefork MPM (with only a single process, e.g. prefork and running it with a -X) as well as the worker, it may be a little easier to narrow down once it is logged. That is all I can add to this thread. I'd be a fish out of water on this one. (If I needed to I could get involved, but Nick is right - dev may be a better resource). Perhaps pull the custom module out in a test case to see if you can reproduce it with stock software? Joe -- Joseph Lewis <http://sharktooth.org/> "Divide the fire, and you will sooner put it out." - Publius Syrus
