Subra A Narayanan wrote: > I didnt receive any helpful responses to that posting thats why I am trying > to use apxs. >
You DID get helpful responses - I was one of those responders who said to use apxs. (We pointed you to the tool because there are too many changes across systems, platforms, etc, that it is faster, more efficient, and better quality to use a tool that also makes the end result more portable - go figure). > Would you care to take a look at this issue => > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-modules-dev/200711.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED] > We need no more discussion on that - use apxs. If you need a Makefile, use the apxs tool in your Makefile. (It IS possible, after all.) For example, Makefile rules might look like : mod_test.so: apxs -c mod_test.so cp .libs/mod_test.so path/to/mod_test.so install: apxs -n mod_test -i mod_test.la That is how I have done all of my modules. It's easier to type "make install" rather than "apxs -i -a -c mod_test.c". If you think you need help in your makefile, go to google, and type in "makefile". Just copying a makefile from another package seriously limits your capabilities. Joe -- Joseph Lewis <http://sharktooth.org/> "Divide the fire, and you will sooner put it out." - Publius Syrus
