Christina Fu wrote:
My filter is a connection filter at tcp level, so I think f->r may not
exists.

Thanks.
Christina

Joe Lewis wrote:
Is it safe to use stack buffer (char out[8192]) here? since I added
flush bucket.
Have you considered using the f->r->pool for this?  That would give
you a chunk of memory related to the full request.

Joe

Christina;

You might be able to try an f->c->pool and use the connection-specific pool. Try that for housing the connection information memory.

Joe
--
Joseph Lewis <http://sharktooth.org/>
"Divide the fire, and you will sooner put it out." - Publius Syrus

Reply via email to