Christina Fu wrote:
My filter is a connection filter at tcp level, so I think f->r may not
exists.
Thanks.
Christina
Joe Lewis wrote:
Is it safe to use stack buffer (char out[8192]) here? since I added
flush bucket.
Have you considered using the f->r->pool for this? That would give
you a chunk of memory related to the full request.
Joe
Christina;
You might be able to try an f->c->pool and use the connection-specific
pool. Try that for housing the connection information memory.
Joe
--
Joseph Lewis <http://sharktooth.org/>
"Divide the fire, and you will sooner put it out." - Publius Syrus