i notice mod_include is implemented as a filter. is this the preferred way to
implment ap_sub_req_lookup_file? currently i implement ap_sub_req_lookup_file
within a handler responsible for calling the appropriate files. within the
handler i only have access to the output_filters, input_filters,
proto_output_filters and proto_input_filters variables in the request_rec as it
is not included in a filter chain including any of these variables in the
ap_sub_req_lookup_file call does not contcatenate the files.
when performing subrequests to concatenate content do you need to run the
filter
chain?
________________________________
From: Ben Noordhuis <i...@bnoordhuis.nl>
To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tue, September 14, 2010 1:17:43 PM
Subject: Re: ap_sub_req_lookup_file vs ap_sub_req_lookup_uri
You call it with next_filter=NULL instead of f->next? That'll skip the
regular filter chain, probably not what you want.
