On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 15:02 +0300, Basin Ilya wrote:

> However, it's inefficient to serve huge virtual files this way when only a 
> small part of such file requested. How to solve this?

Unless your module can handle the byterange itself, you might
want to consider cacheing the generated file for the benefit
of future byterange requests.

-- 
Nick Kew

Reply via email to