> Given that my module already works and does what I want _and_ someone
> (that nobody remembers ;-) else has more ambitious file handle passing
> plans, I think I'll move my module to stable category: I use it
> because it works for me, but I'm not likely to make new releases.
>
> Others should probably use that other module. I take it that jhi
> implied that the other module promiced better support, more stability,
> and well designed "nice" interface, where as mine is pretty bare
> bones, probably wont be made to work on exotic or too buggy platforms
> (file descriptor passing seems to be notorious to be buggily
> implemented on many kernels) and suffers from several days of delay in
> reading mail (i.e. bad support).
No, I didn't imply any of that. Your module is probably just fine.
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
