On 2 Apr 2000, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> We really dislike two letter acronyms for module names even if the
> underlying original code slipped through the cracks with two letters.
Okay no problem.
> I could probably live with Router::LG. But nearly anything is better
> than a two letter root namespace. Could you reconsider, please?
So you're recommending overall:
Router::LG
Router::LG::Cisco
Router::LG::Juniper
It sounds good to me. I'd kind of feed wierd about the creation of the
Router namespace as well, but it'd probably be good for other developers
in the long run.
Do I need to resubmit, or can we just go from here?
-- _______________
Chris Josephes __/ MRNet/Onvoy \
[EMAIL PROTECTED] __/ www.onvoy.com /
\________________/
