Re: HTTP::Request::Form and TreeBuilder.pm (fwd)

[Chris Nandor]

At 10:17 -0800 2000.11.08, Paul J. Lucas wrote:
>> All I would suggest is to classify HTML::Tree deeper, maybe HTML::Tree::Cxx.
>
>That's the best suggestion I'ev heard so far; however, a
>subclass of Cxx is too ugly (never mind that the implementation
>langauge should not be part of the name).

Yes, it shouldn't, but a name also shouldn't be the same as another name.

-- 
Chris Nandor                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]    http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network    [EMAIL PROTECTED]     http://osdn.com/