>>>>> On Sun, 12 Nov 2000 01:20:34 -0800, Steve Traugott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

  > I've got an API module for interacting with MH mail folders via a tied
  > hash -- it's attached for reference.

  > Question is name -- which of the following do folks prefer?

  >     Mail::Tie::mh
  >     Mail::TieMH
  >     Tie::MH
  >     ...any others?

I'd say Mail::TieMH or Mail::MH. The latter because imho the fact that
you are tie-ing does not really need to be reflected in the name.

-- 
andreas

Reply via email to