>>>>> On Sun, 12 Nov 2000 01:20:34 -0800, Steve Traugott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I've got an API module for interacting with MH mail folders via a tied > hash -- it's attached for reference. > Question is name -- which of the following do folks prefer? > Mail::Tie::mh > Mail::TieMH > Tie::MH > ...any others? I'd say Mail::TieMH or Mail::MH. The latter because imho the fact that you are tie-ing does not really need to be reflected in the name. -- andreas
- RFD: MH Mailbox API Steve Traugott
- Re: RFD: MH Mailbox API Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: RFD: MH Mailbox API Steve Traugott
- Re: RFD: MH Mailbox API Graham Barr
- Namespace registration for Mail::TieFol... Steve Traugott