>>>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2000 23:22:34 +0000, Dave Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > How about we go for Symbol::Approx::Sub? We've had a discussion on > the mailing list and that seems to be our favourite. > Please let me know what you think - as I am giving a talk to > london.pm on the module this week and would like to know what to > call it :) Tell them how hard good naming is:-) Symbol::Approx::Sub is fine by me, but I'm still not convinced that abandoning Sub::Approx was necessary. -- andreas
- New module namespace requests [Approx::Sub & GlobWal... Dave Cross
- Re: New module namespace requests [Approx::Sub &... Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: New module namespace requests [Approx::Sub &... Dave Cross
- Re: New module namespace requests [Approx::Sub ... Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: New module namespace requests [Approx::... Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: New module namespace requests [Approx::... Dave Cross
- Re: New module namespace requests [Appr... Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: New module namespace requests ... Dave Cross