>>>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2000 23:22:34 +0000, Dave Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

 > How about we go for Symbol::Approx::Sub? We've had a discussion on
 > the mailing list and that seems to be our favourite.

 > Please let me know what you think - as I am giving a talk to
 > london.pm on the module this week and would like to know what to
 > call it :)

Tell them how hard good naming is:-)

Symbol::Approx::Sub is fine by me, but I'm still not convinced that
abandoning Sub::Approx was necessary.

-- 
andreas

Reply via email to