>>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:51:19 -0800, Vipul Ved Prakash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Cute. One remark: American English speakers use 'armor', not
>> 'armour'. That is also the term used by the PGP package. So I think it
>> is wise to provide both armor and armour (and un&) functions.
> Cool. I'll AUTOLOAD armor/unarmor and write an empty subclass called
> Convert::ASCII::Armor.
Thanks. But now that we have it, I have a hard time determining which
should be the canonical name. I'm biased towards "Armor" because I
know the word from PGP. We need a decision which one is canonical
because I will not list both of them in the module list. HELP!
--
andreas
