On 2001-10-03 13:18:50 +0000, Ed wrote:(from [EMAIL PROTECTED] maillist) > (Hi Leon!) > > If it's possible and Ziya's module is compatible, this faster and more > efficient operation of VCS::Rcs should probably be integrated into it, so > that the API remains constant but performance is improved. Ziya, what are > your thoughts? It is not faster or efficient in all ways. It is more convenient for me to use it cause I checkout all the revisions at once. Because they are not written to disk -as 'co' would do- and everything is in the memory, its lot easier to process what's in the revisions. Thats all. An integration is a good idea. But I don't know how. I am open to any ideas you guys might like to share.
Finally -for the sake of namespace- it looks like VCS::Rcs:: is the best place for it, for now. I have just uploaded it to pause. Cheers Ziya
