On Nov 13, Wolfgang Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
> This is a followup to the MRML top level name space discussion.
>
> I think that's it. Why not create a DTD top level namespace for all modules
> that provide essentially routines for treating a DTD? We still can do
> something special for the "bigger" DTDs like SOAP, MPEG-7 (OK, that's an XML
> Schema) and stuff.
>
> What do you think? If you create DTD, I am very happy with DTD::MRML. This is
> really less obscure than finding XML::MRML among XML::Parser etc.
That could be misleading. Specific modules don't always reference a
DTD -- they may use XMLSchema, an RFC, something informal, etc -- and
they may have nothing to do with validation.
I don't have an alternative in mind, but I like the idea of a top-level
namespace for `specific XML implementations and applications'. I'm open to
suggestions.
- Kurt
