On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 12:08:22PM +0100, Mark Overmeer wrote: > I think were are getting into a syntax debate for one of the > documentation parsers which is implemented for OODoc. Debates > about syntax are about as subjective as those about coding styles.
I did not know that you plan to implement drastically different document parsers other than POD, so now I see that OODoc is indeed better suited to the large-scaled templating framework you have in mind. Since it would support inclusion, inheritance and pluggable parsers and preprocessors, let's call it... Template Toolkit! :-) (But seriously, did you look into using TT2 to implement the backend of your parser and processing engine?) > To come back to remarks so far: the name POD::OO is not honest to what > the module does, but might be easier to "sell" to new users. I have no > objections to a different name than OODoc, as long as it contains the > real power of the module. After your remarks that raised your module to the 'software framework' level required by a top-level CPAN name, I see that OODoc is an adequate name and am willing to approve it, if no better suggestions comes up in a couple days. Thanks, /Autrijus/
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
