[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
In article <[email protected]>, Kan Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > I had hesitated about requesting the "Util" namespace for the reason > made obvious by your comments. But I overcame my hesitation after > seeing a few other registered modules in similar vein. Following bad examples doesn't make it right. I'd like to see you come up with good, descriptive names that help people find your modules and know what they do. I think all of your modules probably already fit into an existing top-level namespace. Don't think they all have to live in the same namespace. Now it's just a matter of finding the right second-level namespace that accurately distinguishes your module from others. Our thoughts on modules names are at: https://pause.perl.org/pause/query?ACTION=pause_namingmodules Good luck :) -- brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org PAUSE instructions: http://pause.perl.org/pause/query?ACTION=pause_04about Archives: http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/modules Please send all messages back to [email protected] with no CC to me.
