> In article <201103271604.p2rg4bni013...@pause.fiz-chemie.de>, Perl > Authors Upload Server <upl...@pause.perl.org> wrote: > >> The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List: >> >> modid: SAFT::Simple >> DSLIP: RdpOp >> description: Create archival finding aids using SAFT-XML >> userid: MHO (Martin Hoppenheit) > >> Since not every possibility the SAFT DTD allows is covered by the >> module (and probably never will) I decided to name it SAFT::Simple. > > How about just SAFT, with room to grow so it can cover the entire DTD? > Maybe you don't have that now but people will add it :) > > Generally we don't like "Simple" because that doesn't describe what's > left out and what's actually simplified: > > https://pause.perl.org/pause/authenquery?ACTION=pause_namingmodules > > -- > brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org
Ooops, seems I missed that part of the "naming modules" article, sorry for that! Just SAFT definitely seems like a good name (provided there indeed is no appropriate rootlevel namespace I could fit in - but it seems there isn't). Can you (or someone else) change my namespace request from "SAFT::Simple" to "SAFT", or should I start a new registration? (I hope I have not missed the part answering that question as well...) Thanks, Martin
