Correct! On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Yuval Kogman <nothingm...@woobling.org> wrote:
> Does that just give the next uploader first come privileges? If so I think > I will do that for all of my modules > > On 19 Oct 2016 19:18, "Karen Etheridge" <ka...@froods.org> wrote: > >> I would suggest simply dropping ownership on all namespaces you're not >> interested in. There doesn't have to be a new owner. >> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Chad Granum <exodi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I do not need 't1', but I can still grab it if you are desperate to be >>> rid of it. >>> >>> -Chad >>> >>> On Oct 19, 2016 4:51 AM, "Yuval Kogman" <nothingm...@woobling.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Failed to reply to all... Sorry >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: Yuval Kogman <nothingm...@woobling.org> >>>> Date: 19 October 2016 at 12:48 >>>> Subject: Re: The 't2' namespace >>>> To: Matt S Trout <m...@shadowcat.co.uk> >>>> >>>> >>>> I've just done this myself, to save mst the trouble and as a form of >>>> agreeing. >>>> >>>> Anybody want t1? ;-) >>>> >>>> On 18 October 2016 at 16:47, Matt S Trout <m...@shadowcat.co.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Given this namespace is just one for testing, if nobody objects in a >>>>> day >>>>> or two I'll transfer it NUFFIN -> EXODIST. >>>>> >>>>> (sent to modules@perl.org for a public record of this and a chance >>>>> for others >>>>> to tell me if I'm wrong) >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:22:56AM -0700, Chad Granum wrote: >>>>> > oops, looping in the last author to mint a release. >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Chad Granum <exodi...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > > According to Pause the 't2' namespace is provided >>>>> > > by Catalyst::Plugin::Session. I can also see that ever since 2009 >>>>> efforts >>>>> > > were made to hide that namespace from pause, which means if you >>>>> run `cpanm >>>>> > > t2` it installs the plugin version 0.20 from 2009. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Would it be a problem, and would anyone object to turning that >>>>> namespace >>>>> > > over to me to populate with a completely different module? If that >>>>> would >>>>> > > cause a problem, or if you just don't want to that is fine, but I >>>>> had to >>>>> > > ask :-) >>>>> > > >>>>> > > FYI I have an experiment I want to run in the namespace, might be >>>>> > > horrifying and get thrown out, might end up handy, we will see. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Thanks, >>>>> > > >>>>> > > -Chad >>>>> > > >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit >>>>> and a clue >>>>> >>>>> http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ >>>>> http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/ >>>>> >>>>> Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our >>>>> CPAN >>>>> commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your >>>>> team. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>
