>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 03:56:43 +0300, rslov...@yandex.com said:
> Greetings, > I am the author of Dot (https://metacpan.org/release/RSLOVERS/Dot-v1.0.0), > it only uses Dot as a package name, when I search for it using View Permissions > on the PAUSE website I couldn't find any match, yet I received a email > from PAUSE saying that I do not have the permission for the package Dot > and indexing has failed, here's the full content of the mail: >> The following report has been written by the PAUSE namespace indexer. >> Please contact modules@perl.org if there are any open questions. >> >> User: RSLOVERS (æ¨ åš) >> Distribution file: Dot-v1.0.0.tar.gz >> Number of files: 12 >> *.pm files: 1 >> README: Dot-v1.0.0/README >> META-File: Dot-v1.0.0/META.json >> META-Parser: Parse::CPAN::Meta 1.4414 >> META-driven index: no >> Timestamp of file: Mon May 28 13:15:23 2018 UTC >> Time of this run: Mon May 28 13:16:53 2018 UTC >> >> This distribution name will only be indexed when uploaded by users with >> permission for the package Dot. Either someone else has ownership over >> that package name, or this is a brand new distribution and that package >> name was neither listed in the 'provides' field in the META file nor >> found inside the distribution's modules. Therefore, no modules will be >> indexed. >> >> Further details on the indexing attempt follow. >> >> No or no indexable package statements could be found >> in the distro (maybe a script or documentation >> distribution or a developer release?) >> >> __END__ I can confirm, nobody else has ownership on it: grep -i ^dot, /home/ftp/pub/PAUSE/modules/06perms.txt ==> empty I can confirm, the file was not listed in the provides field (there was no provides field). But the file exists within RSLOVERS/Dot-v1.0.0.tar.gz, path being Dot-v1.0.0/Dot.pm. And it contains the package and version statements: package Dot; our $VERSION = v1.0.0; I retried to run the indexer and got the same result. May I ask for more eyeballs to suggest a solution? The only thing that appears really problematic is the use of a v-string as the version number. This is not recommended practice. I recommend reading up on that in http://www.dagolden.com/index.php/369/version-numbers-should-be-boring/ > Is there any way to solve this problem? Since I could not fix the issue in the indexer's code, I manually gave you permissions on the 'Dot' namespace. Please make another upload attempt with a better $VERSION line and let us know whether it works now for you. Regards && Sorry for the inconvenience, -- andreas