On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 7:12 PM Sawyer X <xsawy...@cpan.org> wrote: > +1 from me. > > I agree with Dan on Dual-Life org. >
What's so attractive about Dual-Life modules ? I have only negative experiences on that front ... waiting for interminably long periods of time for the maintainer to approve, then to upload a new version of the module ... just so that changes can be made to the perl core. Much better, IMO, if p5p can make the changes immediately to the perl source, if they see fit. I guess there must be some argument in support of dual-life. What is it ? Cheers, Rob
