* This is the modus mailing list *

Hello Ken,

While the sieve filters have not changed from 2.x they are almost a
thing of the past.. I am only using 2 filters, one to bypass some
specific addresses and another one to do input some variables for new
viruses that may not yet be in the anti-virus engine.

The big "spam kicker" is the new SCA engine.. You can read about it
here: http://www.vircom.com/Modus3/

I have no server wide whitelist/blacklist.  I don't believe you will
need them except for maybe a pesty person who likes to harass...

Challenge/response is not used.

You can still select the levels of scanning for viruses, spam and
attachments.

You will be PLEASED!!

Ronnie



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Grimes
> Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 10:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Modus] When is 3.0 due out?
> 
> 
> * This is the modus mailing list *
> 
> While holding my breath for the November 3rd release, we have
> a few questions for the beta testers if it doesn't violate 
> their NDA's.  First, I read from the list that the companies 
> that are currently running the M3 setup have all experienced 
> great results with filtering the spammers known techniques 
> but are these due to the next generation Sieve filters or are 
> these the result of "server wide" whitelisting/blacklisting 
> or challenge/response?  If you answer to the first question 
> is "yes", have you contacted all your customers to make them 
> aware of the new challenge/response system just to pre-warn 
> them of the possible delays in message receipt?  Second 
> question, of the companies and domains using the challenge 
> response is there anyone whom has put together a list of 
> important newsgroups that we could implement prior to 
> customer complaints about their Yahoo Groups now not being 
> received because of their non-response capacity? Thirdly, has 
> anyone had experience with third party mail relaying with 
> regards to what additional functionality can you filter for 
> these servers? In other words, in Modus 2.x we can select 
> filtering of SPAM, VIRUS, or ATTACHMENTS independently, will 
> version M3 allow the additional the new white/black or 
> challenge/response options for relays?  Fourth, if you have 
> implemented the challenge/response how does M3 perform with 
> massive spam attacks from the same IP if using different 
> forged return addresses?  In other words, if 20,000 messages 
> come from 80.123.123.123 all with different forged return 
> addresses will it perform challenges for each message or will 
> it cache it's results and prevent wasted bandwidth by auto 
> "identifying" a new spammers IP that may not be blocked by 
> the RBL's yet.
> 
> Just curious about these in advance,
> Ken Grimes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 4:53 PM
> Subject: [Modus] When is 3.0 due out?
> 
> 
> > * This is the modus mailing list *
> >
> > We see fewer false positives now than when we were using
> Modus 2 along
> > with spamassassin!  The nice thing is that users will be able to go
> > into their quarantines and check for them and can add them 
> themselves
> > to their whitelist.
> >
> > MikeH
> >
> >
> > ----
> >
> > I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
> >
> > Mike Herrera
> > Access One Online Services
> > http://www.access-one.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Robert Sinclair
> > Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 4:40 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Modus] When is 3.0 due out?
> >
> >
> > * This is the modus mailing list *
> >
> > What about false positives? How well is it handling those?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mike Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 12:58 PM
> > Subject: [Modus] When is 3.0 due out?
> >
> >
> >
> > **
> > To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
> > word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
> 
> 
> **
> To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the 
> word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
> 


**
To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.

Reply via email to